Contents
- 1 April 26
- 1.1 File:Minori Aoi 2nd International Healthy City Conference.jpg
- 1.2 File:SV102262.jpg
- 1.3 File:Herb and Geronimo Valley Entertainment Monthly.jpg
- 1.4 File:VEM Issue Eight.jpg
- 1.5 File:VEM Issue Four.jpg
- 1.6 File:Valley Entertainment Monthly Issue Eight.jpg
- 1.7 File:ZeusCourtingGanymede.jpg
- 1.8 File:Kazakhstan Central Concert Hall smm.jpg
- 1.9 File:Swimming.png
- 1.10 File:Shariff.jpg
April 26
edit
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Doubtful that this is in the public domain, as the source doesn't indicate so. — ξxplicit 00:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SV102262.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image appears to be a derivative work of this. It's unclear if the person who took the picture and the uploader are the same person. — ξxplicit 00:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 00:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- scanned from a newspaper unlikely to be under this license IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:VEM Issue Eight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- scanned from a newspaper unlikely to be under this license IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 00:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:VEM Issue Four.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- scanned from a newspaper unlikely to be under this license IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 00:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- scanned from a newspaper unlikely to be under this license IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ZeusCourtingGanymede.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Nothing can prove this photograph is PD-old (i.e. the photographer is dead for more than 70 years). This image was already transferred 2 times on Commons, and deleted each time for this reason (see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ZeusCourtingGanymede.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1). Bibi Saint-Pol (parler) 09:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of permission. Hekerui (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this file has to go. We can't call it {{PD-old}} without identifying the photographer. It's not eligible for {{PD-art}} since it is a photo of a 3D work of art, not of a 2D work of art. I also can't see any way for it to comply with WP's non-free content criteria since many free images of kylixes are available at Commons. —RP88 16:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- appears to duplicate http://www.cumbu.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Astana-Kazakhstan-State-Auditorium-by-Studio-Nicoletti-Associati-Exterior-5.jpg except in size, metadata raises uncertainty of copyvio though VernoWhitney (talk) 14:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Swimming.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Under cc-nc: http://www.everkinetic.com/page/creative-commons-license • ɔ ʃ → 16:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hmm, the page clearly says "The license we chose for Everkinetic is a attribution, share-alike license." and links to the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 text, but then throw in that "Provided you don't make a profit from the workout programs ..." bit at the end there, not sure what to make of that. They do seem a bit confused... --Sherool (talk) 23:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shariff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is licensed as a fair-use screenshot from the film, Doctor Zhivago, but isn't. Sharif is a good few years older here than he was in Doctor Zhivago, the hairstyle doesn't match the one he had in the film, and besides the film was in colour. The source the picture was taken from does not identify it as a screenshot from Doctor Zhivago. It may be possible to keep the image under a different license, but the present one is inadequate. JN466 17:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added a dfu template. It's not a screenshot from the movie, as claimed by the rationale. --JN466 14:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.